The New Playbook for Higher Education Communications Strategy

The Stakes Have Changed

Political scrutiny is up. Public trust is down. And the communications strategies that served higher education in the past are no longer sufficient to meet the moment. This playbook draws on our work with colleges, universities, and higher education associations to outline what’s changed, what’s not working, and how institutions must think differently to better manage reputations and mitigate risk.

Federal and state policymakers have made higher education a sustained target. Congressional inquiries, executive actions, and state legislative challenges have put institutions on defense in ways their communications infrastructure was never built to handle.

Thanks to social media and online forums, a campus incident that once could be managed locally now has the potential to become a national story within hours. Many institutions built their crisis plans around a model — close the gates, keep it quiet — that no longer exists.

It’s no longer sufficient or smart for colleges and universities to prioritize communications with a limited audience of alumni, current and prospective students, faculty, and board members. Community leaders, residents, regional employers, and local civic organizations are increasingly attentive to the activities of the institutions in their region. Overlooking these audiences can lead to unexpected challenges and missed opportunities. 

False narratives spread faster than corrections, especially in this fragmented digital world in which a growing number of Americans piece together information from social media or generative AI. The institutions that lose these fights are rarely the ones that say the wrong thing. They are the ones that said nothing for three days. A reactive communications posture is no longer sufficient — a proactive one, built to move in hours, is the baseline.


What’s Not Working Anymore

The institutions struggling most tend to share the same set of habits — approaches that made sense in a different environment but are now working against them.

  • Denial that the criticism is earned. Public concerns about cost, debt, and whether a degree still pays off aren’t a misperception problem. Institutions that treat skepticism as bad messaging rather than a real failing of their own making won’t be believed on anything else.
  • Over-reliance on paid marketing. Enrollment marketing is not a reputation-building strategy. Although paid channels targeting prospective students and other stakeholders are a critical part of any plan, it should not be a substitute for proactive narrative work with a broader public.
  • Generic brand messaging. Vague claims about academic excellence and state-of-the-art facilities don’t answer the questions skeptical audiences are actually asking: What does a degree mean in the labor market? How is your school responding to the affordability crisis? How are you preparing students to compete for good-paying jobs?
  • Siloed communications teams. When marketing, PR, government affairs, and leadership aren’t operating from a shared framework, the message fractures and the ability to communicate effectively and quickly is stymied. And when a crisis hits, this absence of an integrated response plan becomes immediately apparent.
  • Reactive crisis strategies — or none at all. Institutions that navigate crises well have prepared for them in advance, and they dedicate time to regularly review and update their approach. A crisis plan that only gets opened (or developed) when something has already gone wrong is not a plan. It’s a liability.

What Leading Institutions Are Doing Differently

The institutions getting this right are making the same strategic choices — deliberately and creatively.

Communications cannot outrun a track record. The institutions gaining ground are building programs aimed squarely at the grievances driving distrust — free tuition guarantees and cost-reduction efforts, transfer pipelines between two- and four-year colleges, sunsetting programs that don’t lead to real career opportunities, confronting grade inflation, publishing placement and wage outcomes, and creating pathways for nontraditional students — and then publicizing them relentlessly. Yale’s 2026 Committee on Trust in Higher Education report shows why cost belongs at the top of that list, and why the telling matters as much as the fix: nearly half of Americans still believe colleges charge every student the same price regardless of income. A reform no one understands earns no credit.

Institutions that forge thoughtful partnerships with local employers take a proactive approach to addressing questions about ROI. For example, the University of Memphis built a direct talent pipeline with FedEx — the city’s largest employer — creating paid internship pathways and establishing a call center on campus where students could develop job-ready skills before graduation. Similarly, institutions that are actively thinking outside the box to develop pathways for workforce development often receive media attention and accolades, showing that engaging the business community isn’t just good for student outcomes, it’s also beneficial for boosting reputation and amping up positive PR.

The institutions building the strongest reputations are placing op-eds in mainstream media, reaching out to business and industry publications, speaking at nontraditional venues like the Wall Street Journal’s Future of Everything conference, and showing up at local Rotary Club and Chamber of Commerce meetings. If higher education is going to change the national narrative about its value, institution leaders must consistently make the case to audiences who don’t already agree with them.

Local communities, employers, civic organizations, and regional media are not peripheral; they shape an institution’s reputation in ways that matter beyond enrollment. The institutions that benefit from goodwill during a crisis are the ones that cultivated those relationships before anything went wrong.

Speed is a structural problem, not a messaging one. Institutions that respond in hours have already settled who speaks, to which audience, on which channel — before the story breaks. Their media plans reach regional, business, and industry press, not just trades. Their leaders are as ready for a podcast or an online forum as a press conference. Their crisis protocols are rehearsed rather than filed.


How to Build a High-Performing Communications Strategy: The Playbook

1Back your story with proof — then tell it often. Don’t assume your audiences know what makes your institution matter — but don’t rely on repetition alone to win over skeptics who feel burned before. Anchor your case in evidence — outcomes data, cost transparency, workforce results — and make it proactively, creatively, and repeatedly. Document your contributions and successes through community impact reports, thought leadership opportunities, social media campaigns, and earned media hits in influential markets.
2Diversify your audience. Go beyond the higher education trades. Pursue mainstream media opportunities, such as business publications, regional press, and industry outlets, where your story can reach the audiences whose perceptions you most need to shape.
3Build and activate your full stakeholder ecosystem. Local communities, employers, civic organizations, and regional media are not afterthoughts. Showcase your value to them and cultivate productive relationships before you need them.
4Prepare for crisis before it happens. Scenario planning, media training, response protocol, and stakeholder mapping should happen before a crisis, not during one. By the time something breaks, the playbook should already exist.
5Demonstrate ROI through workforce partnerships. Forge employer partnerships that create real, visible student outcomes and promote them. This is both an educational strategy and a reputational one.
6Use your alumni, board, and supporters as amplifiers. Notable alumni can carry your story to audiences your owned channels can’t reach. Op-eds, speaking opportunities, and social media advocacy from credible voices extend reach in ways institution-owned messaging alone cannot.
7Get out of the higher education bubble. Presidents and chancellors who only appear before higher education audiences are preaching to the choir. Seek out unexpected venues — business conferences, podcasts, civic organizations, mainstream media — and make the case where it counts.
8Integrate your communications structure. Speed is a function of structure. When marketing, communications, government affairs, and leadership work from one framework — with clear decision rights, pre-designated spokespeople, and a single approval path — you can respond quickly. Settle who signs off before the story breaks.

How We Partner with Higher Education Leaders

We work with colleges, universities, and higher education associations to build the communications infrastructure that drives long-term resilience. From crisis planning and execution to executive visibility and earned media engagement, GSG helps higher education stakeholders navigate risk, boost resilience, and tamp down negative narratives.

Crisis Planning & Response

Scenario planning, media training, and real-time response support when it matters most.

Reputation Strategy

Stakeholder mapping and long-term narrative development to protect and strengthen institutional standing.

Earned Media Strategy

Expanding reach beyond higher education trades into mainstream and regional outlets.

Executive Visibility

Thought leadership positioning for presidents, chancellors, and association leaders.

Political & Government Affairs

Congressional inquiry prep, testimony support, and state-level legislative strategy.

Audience Research & Messaging

Data-driven message development grounded in how your key audiences actually think.

Paid Media & Content Creation

Targeted paid campaigns and original content that carry your proof points to audiences earned media alone won’t reach.


Ready to build a stronger communications strategy?

Talk to our higher education experts.

Alexandra Sollberger

Alexandra Sollberger is a Senior Vice President at GSG, where she leads communications and public affairs work for colleges, universities, and higher education associations navigating political scrutiny, reputational risk, and a rapidly shifting public narrative about the value of a degree. With nearly two decades of experience — including as communications director for the U.S. House Education & the Workforce Committee — Alex brings deep policy fluency, a national media network, and a track record of helping institutions tell their story to audiences well beyond the higher education trades.